Myanmar Earthquake Junta Management Analysis
The Myanmar Earthquake of March 2025: Junta Management and Humanitarian Response
This article was created in conjunction with Google Gemini 2.0 Deep Research (Get in-dept research reports) AI technology, then made sure it was fact-checked.
TL;DR Key Takeaways :
A powerful 7.7 magnitude earthquake struck Myanmar on March 28, 2025, causing widespread devastation in the Mandalay and Sagaing regions, exacerbating an existing humanitarian crisis due to the ongoing civil conflict following the 2021 military coup.
The junta's initial response involved a rare appeal for international aid but was quickly followed by restrictions on access for foreign media and aid workers, raising concerns about transparency and control.
International aid was offered by numerous countries and organizations, but its delivery was significantly hampered by the junta's conditions, bureaucratic hurdles, and the continuation of the civil conflict.
Humanitarian organizations reported immense needs for food, water, healthcare, and shelter, but faced significant challenges in accessing affected populations due to road damage, communication disruptions, and restrictions imposed by the junta.
The junta's management of the disaster has been widely criticized for prioritizing political control and military objectives over the urgent needs of the affected population, with allegations of aid being blocked or diverted, especially to opposition-held areas.
Long-term recovery efforts face significant challenges due to the ongoing conflict, weakened infrastructure, and pre-existing humanitarian needs, requiring sustained commitment from both domestic and international actors.
The earthquake had a devastating impact on the population, causing thousands of fatalities, injuries, and widespread displacement, particularly affecting vulnerable groups like internally displaced persons, women, and children.
Critical infrastructure, including homes, hospitals, roads, and communication networks, suffered extensive damage, further complicating rescue and relief efforts.
Recommendations from the report include lifting restrictions on aid, increasing international funding through non-junta channels, pressing for a ceasefire, and prioritizing support for local civil society organizations.
Executive Summary
On March 28, 2025, Myanmar was struck by a powerful 7.7 magnitude earthquake near Mandalay and Sagaing, resulting in widespread devastation across several regions. This significant seismic event occurred against the backdrop of an already severe humanitarian crisis stemming from the ongoing civil conflict that followed the 2021 military coup. The ruling military junta's management of the earthquake's aftermath has been marked by a complex interplay of initial appeals for international assistance and subsequent actions that severely restricted the delivery of aid, particularly to areas not under their direct control. The pre-existing conflict significantly complicated rescue and relief efforts, with the junta facing widespread criticism from humanitarian organizations and the international community for allegedly prioritizing political control and military objectives over the urgent needs of the affected population. While international aid was offered and, in some cases, delivered, its effectiveness was hampered by access limitations, bureaucratic hurdles, and security concerns arising from the continued conflict. The long-term recovery prospects remain uncertain, heavily dependent on the evolving political situation and the sustained commitment of both domestic and international actors. The earthquake's impact on the population and infrastructure has been immense, exacerbating the vulnerabilities of already marginalized groups and posing significant challenges for future stability and development. The overall assessment indicates that the junta's response has been largely criticized for obstructing aid and prioritizing control in a dire humanitarian crisis.
The fact that this natural disaster struck a nation already grappling with a protracted and complex humanitarian emergency significantly shaped the context of the response. Years of civil conflict had left millions displaced and in need of assistance, weakening the country's infrastructure and straining its resources even before the earthquake. Consequently, the earthquake did not occur in isolation but rather compounded an existing crisis, making the delivery of aid and the management of the disaster inherently more challenging.
Introduction: Context of Myanmar and the Earthquake
Myanmar has been in a state of political turmoil since the military, known as the junta, seized power in a coup in February 2021, ousting the democratically elected government. This action ignited a widespread civil conflict, with numerous opposition forces and ethnic armed organizations actively resisting the junta's rule. The junta has maintained tight control over information, imposing significant restrictions on media access and internet usage, which has often hindered the flow of independent reporting and international scrutiny. The international community has largely condemned the coup and the junta's subsequent actions, imposing various sanctions and calling for a return to democracy.
Against this backdrop of political instability and conflict, a powerful 7.7 magnitude earthquake struck central Myanmar on Friday, March 28, 2025, at approximately 12:50 local time. The earthquake's epicenter was located near the cities of Mandalay and Sagaing in the Sagaing Region, at a shallow depth of 10 kilometers. The tremors were felt across a wide area, causing significant damage in the Mandalay Region, Sagaing Region, Nay Pyi Taw Union Territory, and southern Shan State, with lesser impact reported in Bago Region, Magway Region, and eastern Shan State. The earthquake's impact extended beyond Myanmar's borders, with tremors felt in neighboring countries including Thailand, Bangladesh, China, and Vietnam, causing damage and casualties in some of these areas as well. Initial reports indicated widespread destruction, with thousands of buildings damaged or collapsed, and a significant number of fatalities and injuries.
The magnitude of this seismic event was particularly significant as it was the most powerful earthquake to strike Myanmar since 1912. This historical context underscores the potential for widespread devastation and the challenges associated with responding to such a major natural disaster in a country already facing immense difficulties.
The Junta's Immediate Response
In the immediate aftermath of the earthquake, the ruling junta made several official announcements and initiated some response measures. Within hours of the disaster, the junta declared a state of emergency in six of the most affected regions: Sagaing, Mandalay, Magway, eastern Shan State, Naypyidaw, and Bago. In a somewhat unusual move, given their history of isolation and self-reliance, the junta also made a rare request for international humanitarian aid, acknowledging the scale of the disaster and the need for external assistance. A spokesperson for the military government, Maj. Gen. Zaw Min Tun, provided updates on the situation, including the rising death toll, the number of injured and missing, and the involvement of both local and international personnel in search and rescue operations. To ensure consistent future documentation, the junta officially named the event "the Big Mandalay Earthquake".
Despite initially indicating that all assistance was welcome, the junta soon imposed restrictions that complicated the international response. Emergency workers from Taiwan were reportedly refused entry into the country, and foreign media were largely barred from reporting on the situation from within Myanmar. This control over information and access raised concerns about the junta's transparency and their willingness to allow independent assessment of the needs on the ground. Later, on April 2, the junta announced a temporary ceasefire, expected to last until April 22, ostensibly to facilitate relief and reconstruction efforts.
The junta also deployed local resources for search and rescue operations. Maj. Gen. Zaw Min Tun stated that 1,738 personnel from 20 countries were involved in these efforts, which had helped to find and extract 653 survivors. However, in many isolated rural villages, initial rescue activities were primarily carried out by local villagers themselves. Reports from the ground indicated that volunteers often lacked the necessary machinery and safety equipment to conduct effective and safe rescue operations. Notably, in the initial hours following the earthquake, security forces were reportedly absent in many of the affected areas.
Initial efforts at aid distribution by the junta appeared to be concentrated in areas under their direct control. For instance, robust assistance, including water, temporary toilets, and phone-charging stations, was reportedly provided in Naypyidaw, the seat of the junta's power. However, local media reported that junta authorities in Sagaing imposed restrictions on community-led responses, requiring authorization for volunteers and donated items. Shortages of essential goods like gasoline and food were also reported in many affected areas due to the closure of shops and markets in the aftermath of the earthquake. Furthermore, curfews that had been in place since the COVID-19 pandemic were not lifted, which significantly hindered nighttime search and rescue efforts.
The junta's initial response revealed a complex and at times contradictory approach. While publicly appealing for international aid, their simultaneous imposition of restrictions on access and information suggested a desire to maintain control and manage the narrative surrounding the disaster, potentially at the expense of a more comprehensive and effective humanitarian response.
International Aid and Cooperation
Following the junta's appeal, numerous international governments and organizations offered assistance to Myanmar. The Quad partners, comprising the United States, Australia, India, and Japan, collectively committed over USD 20 million in humanitarian aid. The United States initially pledged $2 million in aid through Myanmar-based humanitarian organizations and later announced an additional $7 million. The United Kingdom pledged $13 million and offered to match up to $5 million in private donations. China, a key ally of the junta, provided both financial aid and dispatched emergency response teams. India also sent rescue teams and established a field hospital to assist the injured. The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) played a coordinating role in the regional response. The United Nations allocated $15 million for immediate aid and mobilized pre-positioned supplies. The World Health Organization (WHO) provided significant quantities of medical supplies to the affected regions. The International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) launched an emergency appeal for 100 million CHF to support relief and early recovery efforts.
The junta's stance on accepting international aid was marked by certain conditions and restrictions. While initially welcoming assistance, they required international organizations to seek prior permission before deploying to Myanmar. As previously mentioned, emergency workers from Taiwan were refused entry , and foreign media access was severely limited. There were also reports suggesting that aid was being redirected to military strongholds, potentially at the expense of the hardest-hit civilian areas.
Coordination of international aid delivery involved various mechanisms, with the junta likely seeking to maintain overall control. The ASEAN Coordinating Centre for Humanitarian Assistance on Disaster Management (AHA Centre) was involved in coordinating regional efforts. The UN worked in coordination with local authorities to assess needs and facilitate aid delivery. The Quad partners also established a coordination group to ensure their response was effective and efficient.
Despite the offers of aid, there were several instances where assistance was reportedly blocked or refused by the junta. The refusal of entry to the Taiwanese rescue team was a notable example. Numerous reports from humanitarian organizations and media outlets indicated that the junta was actively blocking aid from reaching areas controlled by opposition forces. There were even reports of junta forces firing on a convoy of the Chinese Red Cross, raising serious concerns about the security of aid operations. Furthermore, bureaucratic hurdles and restrictions imposed by the junta further impeded the timely and effective delivery of humanitarian assistance.
The international aid response to the Myanmar earthquake was substantial, reflecting a global recognition of the urgent humanitarian needs. However, the effectiveness of this aid was significantly constrained by the junta's conditions, restrictions, and alleged obstruction, highlighting the complex political dynamics at play in the delivery of emergency relief.
Perspectives from Humanitarian Organizations and Independent Observers
Reports from various humanitarian organizations and independent observers on the ground painted a concerning picture of the situation and the junta's handling of the earthquake's aftermath. The UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) highlighted the increasing human toll and the urgent need for food, water, healthcare, and shelter for millions of affected people. Human Rights Watch strongly criticized the junta, calling for immediate and unfettered access for humanitarian aid and condemning the military's continued airstrikes and restrictions on internet access in affected areas. Amnesty International echoed these concerns, reporting inhumane military attacks in earthquake-stricken regions that were actively hindering relief efforts and exacerbating the suffering of survivors.
The International Rescue Committee (IRC) reported staggering humanitarian needs, with survivors urgently requiring medical care, clean water, food, and shelter, while also noting significant challenges in accessing affected communities due to road damage and communication disruptions. Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) emphasized the communication blackouts in the hardest-hit areas due to the ongoing conflict and stressed the critical need for access to deploy assessment teams and provide emergency trauma care. The World Health Organization (WHO) reported that health workers were overwhelmed, and many health facilities had been damaged or destroyed, leading to a severe shortage of medical supplies. ReliefWeb provided regular situation reports, underscoring the immense scale of the disaster and the fact that it had compounded an already dire humanitarian crisis. Think Global Health detailed how the earthquake had pushed Myanmar's already weakened health system to the verge of collapse, further exacerbated by the junta's systematic attacks on healthcare infrastructure. UN Women focused on the disproportionate impact of the earthquake on women and girls, including increased risks of gender-based violence and disruptions to essential healthcare services.
A recurring theme in the reports from these organizations was the significant limitations on access to affected populations. Road damage, debris, and landslides caused by the earthquake itself, coupled with restrictions imposed by the junta and the ongoing conflict, severely hampered the ability of aid organizations to reach those in need. Communication networks were also severely impacted, with power outages and damage to infrastructure disrupting landline, mobile, and internet services, making it difficult to assess the full extent of the damage and coordinate relief efforts. The continued military conflict and airstrikes in the affected regions posed significant security risks not only for aid workers but also for the earthquake survivors themselves, further complicating the humanitarian response. The effectiveness of aid delivery was frequently questioned, with many organizations alleging that the junta was deliberately blocking or delaying assistance, particularly to areas not under their control.
Humanitarian organizations also highlighted the disproportionate impact of the earthquake on vulnerable populations. Internally displaced persons (IDPs), who had already been forced from their homes due to the ongoing conflict, were further displaced by the earthquake, exacerbating their existing vulnerabilities. Women and girls faced heightened risks of gender-based violence in overcrowded and insecure makeshift shelters, while disruptions to healthcare had severe consequences for their reproductive health. Children were identified as particularly vulnerable, with increased risks of family separation, violence, and exploitation. The lack of clean water and sanitation raised concerns about potential outbreaks of waterborne diseases, and food scarcity threatened to worsen malnutrition, especially among vulnerable groups. The earthquake also took a heavy toll on the mental health and psychosocial well-being of survivors, who had already endured years of conflict and hardship. Reports also indicated a significant impact on Muslim communities in Mandalay and Sagaing, with a large number of casualties reported in mosques.
The consistent message from humanitarian organizations and independent observers was that the junta's actions and the ongoing conflict were creating significant obstacles to an effective and impartial humanitarian response, raising grave concerns for the well-being of the millions affected by the earthquake.
Analysis of the Junta's Management and Response
The junta's management of the earthquake's aftermath has drawn widespread criticism regarding delays, restrictions, and the potential politicization of aid. Numerous reports have accused the junta of deliberately blocking humanitarian assistance from reaching areas controlled by opposition forces, effectively weaponizing aid as a tool of control. There were also allegations of significant delays in the junta's response and aid distribution in certain regions, particularly those with strong anti-junta sentiment. Evidence suggested a prioritization of aid delivery to areas under military control, while the hardest-hit civilian areas, often opposition strongholds, were reportedly neglected. Junta leaders, including Min Aung Hlaing, were criticized for using visits to earthquake-affected areas as photo opportunities to bolster their international image rather than focusing on effective relief efforts. Reports also surfaced accusing the junta of confiscating aid intended for earthquake victims. The enforcement of curfews, initially imposed during the COVID-19 pandemic, continued to hinder nighttime search and rescue operations, further drawing criticism. Disturbingly, there were even reports of the junta using the disaster as cover for forcibly conscripting young men who were involved in digging for survivors.
Despite the overwhelming criticism, there were a few instances that could be interpreted as positive aspects of the junta's response. Their rare initial appeal for international humanitarian aid was seen by some as an acknowledgment of the immense scale of the disaster and their limited capacity to handle it alone. The announcement of a temporary ceasefire, although its implementation was questionable, was also viewed by some as a step in the right direction, potentially creating a window for increased humanitarian access. Additionally, the junta did reportedly provide some assistance in Naypyidaw, the capital city, which is under their firm control.
The ongoing civil conflict has profoundly impacted the junta's ability and willingness to manage the disaster effectively. The conflict has undoubtedly diverted significant resources and attention away from disaster relief efforts. The deep mistrust and hostility between the junta and opposition forces have severely hindered any potential for cooperation on aid delivery, with each side viewing the other with suspicion. The junta's primary focus on maintaining territorial control and suppressing dissent appeared to take precedence over the urgent humanitarian needs of the population, leading to the obstruction of aid and the continuation of military operations even in earthquake-affected areas.
The junta's overall management of the earthquake crisis has been largely characterized by a prioritization of political control and the suppression of opposition over the immediate needs of the affected population. While the initial request for international aid offered a glimmer of hope, subsequent actions by the junta, including restrictions on access and alleged obstruction of aid, have drawn widespread condemnation and raised serious concerns about their commitment to the well-being of their citizens in a time of crisis.
Long-Term Recovery Efforts and Future Outlook
Information regarding specific long-term recovery plans announced or implemented by the junta has been limited. Their immediate focus appeared to be on providing initial relief and maintaining a semblance of peace and stability in the aftermath of the earthquake. One report suggested that the disaster could potentially serve as a catalyst for cooperation among the warring parties, leading to de-escalation and laying the groundwork for peace, although this remained highly uncertain.
The potential for sustained long-term recovery in Myanmar is fraught with challenges given the prevailing political and humanitarian context. The ongoing civil conflict remains the most significant impediment, as it continues to cause instability, displacement, and the destruction of infrastructure, all of which will severely hinder recovery efforts. The country's already weakened health system and damaged infrastructure will further complicate the path to recovery. Pre-existing economic hardship and widespread humanitarian needs will also make it difficult for communities to rebuild their lives and livelihoods.
Despite these challenges, international actors and local organizations are expected to play a crucial role in providing long-term support. The IFRC has launched a 24-month emergency appeal aimed at providing relief and supporting early recovery for affected communities. Organizations like All Hands and Hearts are focusing on establishing partnerships with local groups to provide direct cash assistance and essential goods for longer-term rebuilding. The Clinton Global Initiative has highlighted various organizations that are mobilizing resources for recovery efforts in Myanmar. Fondation de France has also launched an appeal in collaboration with Médecins du Monde and Handicap International to support long-term healthcare and assistance for vulnerable populations. The Center for Disaster Philanthropy's Global Recovery Fund aims to support long-term rebuilding in complex humanitarian emergencies like the one in Myanmar. Recognizing the complexities of the situation, a recent report advised humanitarian actors to adopt a conflict-sensitive and locally driven approach to ensure aid reaches those most in need without inadvertently legitimizing the military junta.
The prospects for meaningful and sustained long-term recovery in Myanmar are closely tied to the broader political situation. Without a significant shift towards peace and stability, and a genuine commitment from all parties to prioritize the well-being of the population, long-term rebuilding will be an arduous and uncertain process. The efforts of international and local organizations will be essential, but their effectiveness will continue to be constrained by the complex and volatile environment.
Impact on the Population and Infrastructure
The earthquake of March 2025 has had a devastating impact on the population and infrastructure of central Myanmar. The human cost has been immense, with official reports indicating over 3,500 fatalities, although estimates from other sources suggest the actual number could be significantly higher. Nearly 5,000 people were reported injured, and over 200 remained missing in the days following the disaster. The earthquake also caused widespread displacement, with millions of people forced to flee their damaged homes and seek shelter in makeshift camps or with relatives. The psychological impact of the earthquake has been profound, exacerbating the existing psychosocial distress caused by years of conflict and instability.
Critical infrastructure across the affected regions suffered extensive damage. Thousands of homes and buildings were either severely damaged or completely destroyed, leaving countless people homeless. Hospitals and health facilities, already struggling due to the ongoing conflict, were also significantly impacted, with several reported to have collapsed and many others sustaining partial damage. Roads and bridges were damaged or buckled, severely disrupting transportation routes crucial for rescue and aid efforts. Power outages were widespread due to damage to electricity systems, further hindering communication and emergency services. Water and sanitation systems were also affected, increasing the risk of waterborne disease outbreaks. Telecommunications networks experienced significant disruptions, limiting the flow of information and hindering coordination. Even Mandalay airport, a key transportation hub, was reportedly closed due to a damaged runway.
The earthquake's impact has been particularly severe for vulnerable groups within the population. Women and girls faced an increased risk of gender-based violence in overcrowded shelters and experienced disruptions to essential healthcare services, including reproductive health care. Children were especially vulnerable, with concerns about family separation and increased risks of exploitation and abuse. Internally displaced persons (IDPs), already living in precarious conditions, were further displaced and their vulnerabilities deepened. Older people and individuals with disabilities also faced unique challenges in accessing assistance and support.
Table 1: Summary of Reported Earthquake Impact (as of early April 2025)
Table 2: International Aid Pledges and Delivery (as of mid-April 2025 - illustrative)
The earthquake has inflicted a heavy toll on Myanmar's population and infrastructure, exacerbating existing vulnerabilities and creating a complex humanitarian emergency that will require sustained and coordinated efforts to address.
Conclusion
The earthquake that struck Myanmar in March 2025 has had a devastating impact on a country already reeling from years of civil conflict and political instability. The ruling military junta's management of the crisis has been marked by a troubling pattern of initially seeking international aid while simultaneously imposing severe restrictions on its delivery, particularly to regions not under their control. This approach, coupled with continued military actions in earthquake-affected areas, has drawn widespread condemnation from humanitarian organizations and the international community, raising serious concerns about the junta's priorities.
The ongoing conflict has significantly complicated rescue and relief efforts, diverting resources and hindering cooperation. The deep mistrust between the junta and opposition forces has further impeded the delivery of essential aid to those most in need. While international assistance has been offered and, in some cases, provided, its effectiveness has been hampered by access limitations, bureaucratic hurdles, and security concerns. The long-term recovery prospects for Myanmar remain uncertain, heavily dependent on the evolving political landscape and a genuine commitment from all parties to prioritize humanitarian needs over political objectives. The earthquake's impact on the population and infrastructure has been immense, exacerbating existing vulnerabilities and creating a complex humanitarian emergency with far-reaching consequences.
Recommendations
The junta should immediately lift all restrictions on humanitarian access and ensure the safe and unimpeded delivery of aid to all affected areas, regardless of control.
The international community should increase humanitarian funding for Myanmar and explore alternative channels for aid delivery that bypass junta control, prioritizing local organizations and the National Unity Government (NUG).
International organizations and governments should pressure the junta to cease all military attacks in earthquake-affected areas and commit to a genuine and lasting ceasefire to facilitate relief and recovery efforts.
Stronger international monitoring mechanisms should be established to ensure that aid reaches those in need and is not diverted or misused by the junta.
Support should be prioritized for local civil society organizations and community-based groups who are often the first responders and have strong local networks.
Aid programs should be gender-sensitive and inclusive, addressing the specific needs of vulnerable groups, including women, children, IDPs, and people with disabilities.
Accountability mechanisms should be pursued for any human rights violations or obstruction of aid committed by the junta or other actors.
Long-term recovery efforts should focus on rebuilding infrastructure, restoring livelihoods, and addressing the psychosocial needs of the affected population, while being mindful of the ongoing political context.
The international community should continue its efforts to find a long-term political solution to the conflict in Myanmar, as this is crucial for sustained peace and development, and for building resilience to future disasters.
Works cited
1. Myanmar Earthquake 2025: What it means for women and girls, https://www.unwomen.org/en/articles/explainer/myanmar-earthquake-2025-what-it-means-for-women-and-girls
2. Myanmar earthquake: What's happening and how to help? - International Rescue Committee, https://www.rescue.org/article/myanmar-earthquake-whats-happening-and-how-help
3. Earthquake Pushes Myanmar's Health System to Verge of Collapse | Think Global Health, https://www.thinkglobalhealth.org/article/earthquake-pushes-myanmars-health-system-verge-collapse
4. 2025 Myanmar and Thailand Earthquake - Center for Disaster Philanthropy, https://disasterphilanthropy.org/disasters/2025-myanmar-and-thailand-earthquake/
5. Myanmar: Allow Immediate Aid to Quake-Stricken Areas | Human Rights Watch, https://www.hrw.org/news/2025/04/01/myanmar-allow-immediate-aid-quake-stricken-areas
6. How Myanmar's Junta Is Complicating Earthquake Recovery - Time, https://time.com/7273653/myanmar-junta-earthquake-recovery-aid-civil-war-explainer/
7. In the race to save lives after the Myanmar quake, US rescuers are notable by their absence - AP News, https://apnews.com/article/myanmar-quake-usaid-trump-musk-9a6599ea15a0def922a4cb66e114b23e
8. Post-earthquake ceasefires in Myanmar offer rare opportunity for disaster diplomacy - AP News, https://apnews.com/article/myanmar-earthquake-disaster-diplomacy-b998a9d7acfd2343013af7b926a8a799
9. Guidance on Supporting Disaster Recovery in Myanmar and Thailand | NPTrust, https://www.nptrust.org/philanthropic-resources/philanthropist/guidance-on-supporting-disaster-recovery-in-myanmar-and-thailand/
10. apnews.com, https://apnews.com/article/myanmar-thailand-earthquake-a5ce6c6bd211eba0df4a1e0bf6808a43
11. Myanmar Earthquake: Humanitarian Snapshot (As of 7 April 2025) - ReliefWeb, https://reliefweb.int/report/myanmar/myanmar-earthquake-humanitarian-snapshot-7-april-2025
12. Myanmar earthquake worsens one of the world's largest and most neglected humanitarian crises, https://www.thenewhumanitarian.org/analysis/2025/04/02/myanmar-earthquake-worsens-one-worlds-largest-and-most-neglected-humanitarian
13. Myanmar Earthquake & Conflict: Reaching Underserved Communities with Deepening Vulnerabilities (08 April 2025) - ReliefWeb, https://reliefweb.int/report/myanmar/myanmar-earthquake-conflict-reaching-underserved-communities-deepening-vulnerabilities-08-april-2025
14. Massive quake rocks Myanmar and Thailand. Hundreds feared dead - AP News, https://apnews.com/article/thailand-earthquake-bangkok-4fce87aced74b1fc0cf260fb5454d353 15. Myanmar: Earthquake - Mar 2025 - ReliefWeb, https://reliefweb.int/disaster/eq-2025-000043-mmr
16. M 7.7 - 2025 Mandalay, Burma (Myanmar) Earthquake, https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us7000pn9s/executive
17. Rescue efforts from Myanmar's deadly earthquake wind down - AP News, https://apnews.com/article/myanmar-ceasefire-military-resistance-earthquake-disaster-05329d5a2448d0afd9d7c09e55a1c759
18. Myanmar: Earthquake Response Situation Report No. 1 (As of 7 ..., https://reliefweb.int/report/myanmar/myanmar-earthquake-response-situation-report-no-1-7-april-2025
19. Myanmar military declares ceasefire, but attacks continue, anti-junta groups say, https://myanmar-now.org/en/news/myanmar-military-declares-ceasefire-but-attacks-continue-anti-junta-groups-say/
20. Myanmar earthquake survivors suffer as junta blocks aid to rebel-held areas - YouTube, https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=oewQAcDCyg8
21. In the aftermath of Myanmar's earthquake, reports emerge of the junta attacking its own people | Lowy Institute, https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/aftermath-myanmar-s-earthquake-reports-emerge-junta-attacking-its-own-people
22. Joint Statement by the Quad Partners on Myanmar Earthquake Response, https://www.state.gov/joint-statement-by-the-quad-partners-on-myanmar-earthquake-response/
23. Global Response to Myanmar Earthquake Shines Light on Strategic ..., https://www.irrawaddy.com/opinion/guest-column/global-response-to-myanmar-earthquake-shines-light-on-strategic-rivalries.html
24. Humanitarian Aid in Myanmar's Polycrisis: Navigating Disaster Amid Conflict - Fulcrum.sg, https://fulcrum.sg/humanitarian-aid-in-myanmars-polycrisis-navigating-disaster-amidst-conflict/
25. Myanmar junta blocking aid as earthquake death toll nears 3000 | The BMJ, https://www.bmj.com/content/389/bmj.r657
26. WHO scales up emergency response in earthquake–hit Myanmar, provides 100 tons of medicines and supplies, coordination of Emergency Medical Teams on the ground - World Health Organization (WHO), https://www.who.int/southeastasia/news/detail/04-04-2025-who-scales-up-emergency-response-in-earthquake-hit-myanmar--provides-100-tons-of-medicines-and-supplies--coordination-of-emergency-medical-teams-on-the-ground
27. One Week On: IFRC Scales Up Myanmar Earthquake Response Amid Massive Humanitarian Needs, https://www.ifrc.org/press-release/one-week-ifrc-scales-myanmar-earthquake-response-amid-massive-humanitarian-needs
28. Myanmar Red Cross races against time to save lives after the earthquake - IFRC, https://www.ifrc.org/press-release/myanmar-red-cross-races-against-time-save-lives-after-earthquake
29. UN urges relief efforts in Myanmar as earthquake death toll rises - AP News, https://apnews.com/article/myanmar-earthquake-relief-recovery-united-nations-78ca4581d631cf29e012b5c0c087c880
30. Burma Junta Blocking and Mishandling Aid – ENG.MIZZIMA.COM, https://eng.mizzima.com/2025/04/09/21171
31. IOM Urgently Seeks USD 17.3 Million to Support Communities Hit Hardest by Myanmar Earthquake, https://www.iom.int/news/iom-urgently-seeks-usd-173-million-support-communities-hit-hardest-myanmar-earthquake
32. Where Is the United States? An Earthquake in Myanmar Is the First Test of President Trump's Emergency Aid Cuts - CSIS, https://www.csis.org/analysis/where-united-states-earthquake-myanmar-first-test-president-trumps-emergency-aid-cuts
33. Myanmar: Inhumane military attacks in earthquake areas hindering ..., https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2025/04/myanmar-inhumane-military-attacks-in-earthquake-areas-hindering-relief-efforts/
34. Myanmar and Thailand Earthquake | All Hands and Hearts, https://www.allhandsandhearts.org/storm-tracker/myanmar-thailand-earthquake-march-2025/
35. Responding to Earthquakes in Myanmar and Thailand: How You Can Help, https://www.clintonfoundation.org/press-and-news/clinton-global-initiative/responding-to-earthquakes-in-myanmar-and-thailand/
36. Myanmar Earthquake 2025: Fondation de France Launches Appeal for Support with Médecins du Monde and Handicap International, https://fdf-asia.org/myanmar-earthquake-2025-fondation-de-france-launches-appeal-for-support-with-medecins-du-monde-and-handicap-international/
37. Local expertise key to earthquake relief amid conflict in Myanmar, report advises - mizzima, https://eng.mizzima.com/2025/04/09/21188
38. Myanmar earthquake death toll passes 3300 as UN calls for help | News - Al Jazeera, https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/4/5/myanmar-earthquake-death-toll-passes-3300-as-un-calls-for-help
39. Myanmar earthquake: Facts, FAQs, and how to help | World Vision, https://www.worldvision.org/disaster-relief-news-stories/myanmar-earthquake-facts-faqs-how-to-help
40. Global Unions demand that humanitarian aid reaches Myanmar's people, not the military junta - Education International, https://www.ei-ie.org/en/item/29677:global-unions-demand-that-humanitarian-aid-reaches-myanmars-people-not-the-military-junta
41. UN Security Council Must Enforce Myanmar Junta Ceasefire and Mandate Urgent Humanitarian Response to Earthquake, https://specialadvisorycouncil.org/2025/04/security-council-junta-ceasefire-urgent-humanitarian-earthquake/
42. Statement on the Recent Airstrikes by Military Junta Following Temporary Ceasefire, https://nugmyanmar.org/announcement/statement-on-the-recent-airstrikes-by-military-junta-following-temporary-ceasefire/
43. Surviving the Aftershock: the Reality of First Response in Post-Earthquake Myanmar and Thailand - CU Anschutz newsroom, https://news.cuanschutz.edu/news-stories/surviving-the-aftershock-the-reality-of-first-response-in-post-earthquake-myanmar-and-thailand
Comments
Post a Comment